


11.) In this background, having perused the entire record producedbefore us, we are of the considered view that the Respondent No.1 has notcommitted any error either in law or on facts, while passing the impugnedOrder dated 1st September 2022.
11.1) There are no merits in the Petition and is accordingly dismissed.
11.2) Rule is accordingly discharged.
2025:BHC-AS:7732-DB
Bombay High Court – Principal BenchReported Order-Judgement
SMT. PRABHALAXMI CHHOTALAL YOGANAND THRU POA SHRI. AGRAVAT BALVANTRAI T .V/sCHIEF OFFICER, DIU MUNICIPAL COUNCIL , DIU AND ANRCoram:HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARIHON’BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATADate: 07/02/2025Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-AS:7732-DB

Views: 8


Leave a Reply